Understand The Trading Arena

"It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle." Sun Tzu

Global Macro Analysis

Every markets are linked and should be analyse as a whole to understand what is really happening in the world

Forex Trading

The foreign exchange market is the market of choice for the retail prop shop to capitalize on macro themes.

Liquidity And Market Micro-Structure

Welcome market inefficiencies and learn to profit from them.

Trading Professionaly

Plan your trade and trade your plan.

mercredi 26 juin 2013

Out Of Office...


Dear followers,

I am leaving for a long awaited 3 weeks holiday hence the blog and twitter feed will not get updated until I come back. First I apologize for the disagreement, second I wish everyone a good summer trading. It seems that markets are set for uncommon volatility for this period of the year following Bernanke and Fed adjustment in monetary policy discussions. So it should be good fun for traders!
Regards,
Retailpropshop

A Whole New Group Of People Is Going To Start Worrying About The Gold Crash

 
Back in the day, a few years ago, when gold was soaring, anti-Fed types saw this as indication that Bernanke was blowing bubbles and creating hyperinflation.
 
Of course, the price of gold is just the price of gold, but it didn't stop people from making bold statements about how gold was "voting" against Fed policy so to speak.

Well now gold is totally crashing.

At the start of April it was near $1600/oz.

This morning it's not much above $1200/oz.

Today alone it's down over 3%.

And this time it won't be the hard money inflation hawks who get nervous. It will be the deflation hawks.

The latest turn down in gold comes as people worry about "the taper" and the notion that now Bernanke is being too tight, ignoring signs of disinflation or deflation while talking about exit scenarios.

Larry Kudlow has already hinted that the gold crash is a warning to Bernanke over his latest moves.

Of course, the price of gold is still just the price of gold, so you can't make a grand pronouncement about Fed policy from it. But watch for the folks who think Bernanke is being dangerous with his taper talk to start citing gold.

mardi 25 juin 2013

CITI: 3 Reasons To Sell EUR/USD Targeting 1.2750: A New Macro Trade

EUR/USD could extend its latest drop in the very near term on the back of the following 3 reasons, says Citibank.

1- Euro banking sector risks seem to be on the rise yet again. The ratio between Eurozone and US bank stock indices has slumped close to its record low from July 2012. The last time the European bank stocks traded that low EUR/USD was close to 1.2000. These developments could be addressed at the upcoming EU summit on June 27-28. That said, the risk of disappointment remains and this could weigh on European bank stocks and the euro.

2- Government funding costs are moving back to their highest level since the start of the year across the Eurozone. French, Italian and Spanish bonds have reversed earlier gains and came under fresh selling pressure most recently. This in combination with renewed investor concerns about Greece could trigger another spike in the Eurozone peripheral risks and weigh on EUR.

3- Despite the latest dip in EUR/USD, EUR still looks rather strong across the board. Euro money market rates move ever closer to their February highs as well. These developments look very similar to the tightening of the financial market conditions evident in the run up to the rather dovish ECB meeting in February 2013. A potential repetition of these events could make investors rather cautious on the near term outlook for EUR/USD ahead of the ECB meeting on July 4.

All up, Citi added a short EUR/USD position to its G10 macro portfolio targeting a move t0 1.2750, with a stop at 1.3315 and a 2% VaR risk weight.

JOHN MCCARTHY: Sell Euro As Central Banks Diverge

There's room for the euro to slip against the dollar as the European and US central banks start to head down different paths.

Earlier comments by European Central Bank and Bank of England officials highlight the different trajectories longer-term rates are likely to follow in the coming months as those central banks clearly state they are far from any consideration of reducing monetary accommodation. While the Fed has only outlined potential scenarios for reducing and eventually eliminating bond purchases, this forewarning is far ahead of the position the BOE and ECB face.

The rise in 10-year US Treasury yields has been dramatic, though they seem to be stabilizing around 2.5% for the time being. The fractionally improved US durable goods order, while volatile, suggests continued US economic improvement. EUR/USD in particular looks a little vulnerable as we drift towards the psychological 1.30 level. On other crosses, the euro exhibits little inclination to break above EUR/JPY 130 and runs into strong selling against the pound when EUR/GBP approaches 0.8580-0.08600. EUR/CHF also trades heavy.

Selling EUR/USD, recently at 1.3105, with a stop above 1.3165 looks attractive. A break of 1.3060 should accelerate the downside move with a test of 1.2950 likely.

Applying Metagame Concepts in the Markets

We have learned from the book "Order Flow Trading for Fun and Profit" that metagaming is a term used to define any method or strategy used in a game (read: the markets) that goes beyond a prescribed rule set and includes external factors to affect a game. In short, we have first to learn about the possibilities and limitations that exist in the marketplace (market microstructure), recognize who is participating in the markets and what their characteristics are and finally, combine all of this to exploit the various market inefficiencies that exist. In this article, I will show several examples of how metagaming can be applied when trading. However, it is important that you not limit metagaming to those examples, but make it part of your trading. Whenever you make a decision in your trading, may it be entering/closing or modifying a trade, you must think about what other participants might do and how this can affect your position.

First of all, I want you to understand that while large market participants like dealers and hedge fund prop traders certainly have an advantage given the amount of information and resources they have, they still can get caught on the wrong side of the market and make obvious mistakes. They may not use always physical stop loss orders like almost all retail traders do, but even then, they will have a mental stop – a price point where their trade idea does not make sense anymore and they have to cover their position. The main task for dealers is to trade with various clients in the first place, but they also engage in prop trading where they speculate on short-term price movements. When a dealer anticipates a stop hunt and positions himself for this, price might run into heavy orders ahead of the stops and he will have to cover. Funds can get caught on the wrong side as well, if there is a larger squeeze or fundamentals have changed. We cannot know what i.e. Goldman Sachs traders are doing and what they are thinking, however, the goal of metagaming is not to get such details, but include market psychology and apply it on a large scale. To get to the point: As long as there are humans involved in transactions and we are aware of their characteristics, their behavior can be predictable.

Determining sentiment is not all about fundamentals! Price itself plays a very important role. We are not talking about indicators or any other technical tool, but really price itself. For example, let’s assume EUR/USD has been trading in a 1.32-1.34 range for the past few weeks and sentiment is mixed. There was little significant activity and positioning is rather flat overall. Further, EUR/USD is currently trading around 1.3350, so pretty close to the 1.34 level. There were no changes in fundamental and sentiment amongst most market participants is still mixed. They prefer to trade currencies which clearer bias, like i.e. AUD/USD. Now, let’s say one day, corporates have large demand for Euros. They don’t care about fundamentals or anything, they just want to get the Euros they need for their business transactions. Given little interest in the boring EUR/USD, the corporate demand will push price higher. Dealers will anticipate this and also buy; perhaps they can even get those stops above 1.34 triggered and earn a nice, quick profit. The informed players will know that this rally was caused by a few larger transactions and that there were no real changes in fundamentals. For them, the 1.34 area will be an opportunity to sell EUR/USD and anticipate a move back to the lower range.

However, for the uninformed player, this will look pretty exciting. He will see getting price near 1.34 quickly and buy in anticipation of a break. Some will wait for the actual break, but once it happens, they will rush into buying the pair. Every trader will know the feeling of seeing volatile price action and having the NEED to do something. This is what distinguishes the true professionals from the amateurs – they can control themselves. To get back to the point, the price move itself influenced sentiment for the uninformed players. They will buy into this momentum thinking something has happened and they need to be part of the move. This will be fueled by the buying of dealers and algo programs that accelerate momentum. But once the stops above are filled and the selling from informed players comes in, price will quickly turn. The traders who bought into the rally see their stops getting triggered and they realize that they got a false feeling for sentiment because of the price action.

If we see a rapid move in price, we want to see how price behaves once things settle down a bit. Assuming there is a sharp rally in i.e. GBP/USD, we want to observe if the dips are still well-bid or if the move is losing steam rapidly. A valid price move will have healthy retracements, but it is the type of retracement that will tell you more about the whole situation. Taking the GBP/USD example again, if there are smaller retracements to the downside after a larger up move, but they still run into decent buying interest, we can assume the pair has potential for further gains. If overall sentiment is confirming this, even better!

Inefficiencies happen every day, many times. Markets are in a constant search for liquidity and therefore other participants look for the weak hand in the markets. The weak hand is the group of participants that is trapped on the wrong side of the market and whose stops are vulnerable. Other traders will usually target their stops or squeeze them out of their position to gain advantages for themselves. This is a completely normal process in the markets and has been going on ever since markets exist! What can give you an additional advantage in your trading is applying the metagame concepts in your trading.
When you are buying/selling, what is the reason you do so and can you reasonably expect other participants to do so as well? If you are buying the EUR/USD only because of better than expected German economic data, but the data was released already an hour ago, it is very likely you will be too late to the party. Where will you place your stop and what favors placing it there? You don’t only want to place your stops beyond orders, but also include the power price has on sentiment. Let’s say you are a day trader, have good reasons to short EUR/USD and there are large offers reported at 1.33. It makes sense placing your stop above there because other participants are looking at that level as well. If markets absorb those big offers rather easily, there will be increased demand and less selling interest, driving the price higher. Even if you have good reasons to be short EUR/USD, you don’t want to fight the flow. It might go 1.3380 and since you are looking for a short-term price move, you certainly don’t want to see your position going more than 100 pips in the red. Wait for both conditions and flows to be in your favor. It is better to be a bit late in your entry but catch a nice profit than to fail several times trying to get a perfect entry.

Your task is now to apply the metagame concepts in your live trading. Don’t focus just on yourself, but apply what you have learned about other market participants to anticipate their actions. Make it a part of your daily trading routine – make it a habit! As price moves and you analyze sentiment, always think about what other participants might perceive and do. You don’t have to overanalyze everything, but once you see clear sentiment and identify the weak hand you want to act and exploit them by i.e. targeting their stops.

Metagaming is best learned through experience and hours of watching price action. It might be a daunting task at the first look, but it is definitely worth the effort. Not only will you be able to make better strategic moves, you will identify the weak hand in the market more easily and exploit their decisions.

Milan


RetailPropShop: With the kind permission from Milan@Orderflowtrading.com

BARCLAYS: Looking For Pause In EUR/USD Downtrend

As the rate approaches support near the 1.30 cloud base. Trading at 1.3130, the bank says the near-term range is likely to be between 1.3050 and 1.32, where it would look to sell rallies toward the range highs, for an eventual move that targets 1.2900.

samedi 22 juin 2013

NOMURA: It Was An Epic Week, The Rules Have Changed, And There Will Be No Reversing The Fed's Big Bang


Here's how you know we had a huge week in the market: Research analysts start using blogger terminology in their notes.
George Goncalves, the top interest rate strategy at Nomura, has a note out titled "The Fed's Big Bang Moment, Reversible?" and it starts like this:
An epic week, to say the least, as markets re-priced to what some are calling the start of a new hawkish Fed world order.
And it gets better:
Unless one believes in time-travel, one cannot reverse the Fed‘s big bang moment. Given the rules changed, we need to respect the shift, take a step back and re-analyze our views for now.
So what exactly happened this week to prompt such talk of "epic" moves?
Well if you were only going to look at one chart, it would have to be the yield on the 10-year US bond.
As you can see on this chart via Bloomberg, the yield has been rising since the beginning of May, but in the last week it went vertical, with interest rates ending at 2.53%.
So what's this new "hawkish" Fed all about.
Essentially what happened was, Bernanke made it clear that the "taper" (the wind down of bond purchases) is on. Assuming the economy stays on forecast, the taper will start later this year, with a goal of having it wrapped up sometime in the middle of next year. It was his certainty that this is indeed the plan (as he even put some hard numbers next to the QE thresholds) that seemed to spook the market the most.
In a note published right after the Bernanke press conference, Goldman's Jan Hatzius identified 5 reasons why you could characterize Bernanke as hawkish. We summarize in bullets:
  • The Fed is putting hard numbers for the first time on the winddown of QE.
  • The unemployment rate forecast was lowered significantly.
  • The Fed says downside risks were diminished.
  • The Fed was dismissive of current disinflation trends (said they were transitory).
  • And Bernanke was clearly not concerned about the above spike in interest rates (in fact, if you want to check out a chart, you can see right here how interest rates spiked right after Bernanke said he wasn't concerned about spiking rates on Wednesday).
So the view from Wall Street is that we got regime change this week. For the first time since the crisis, we got hints of the Fed actually wanting to turn the corner.
It may be awhile before the Fed actually does turn the corner. But clearly the Fed wants to, and thus the "epic" week Goncalves is referring to above.


After The Fed Shock, Markets Are Set For More Turmoil


Fasten your seatbelts. And expect lots of turbulence.

If that was the message Ben Bernanke was trying to deliver when he said the Federal Reserve could soon start scaling back its massive stimulus program for the U.S. economy, it's safe to say investors received it loud and clear.
In fact, the sell-off in stocks, bonds and commodities that rippled around the globe after Bernanke's remarks looks to some like the dawn of a new period of volatile, disorderly trade - a stark change from the calm that prevailed since the Fed began its most recent bond-buying program last autumn.
"When market regimes shift, they rarely do so in an orderly fashion - look at equity prices collapsing at the end of the dot-com bubble or the height of the financial crisis," said Stephen Sachs, head of capital markets at exchange-traded fund issuer ProShares in Bethesda, Maryland. "It usually gets violent. We're going to face that in interest rates now."
Indeed, the bond market is at the epicenter of the financial market earthquake that Bernanke unleashed. Benchmark yields, which Fed easing had driven to record lows, surged to near two-year highs and are expected to keep climbing as traders come to grips with the prospect of the Fed ending bond purchases by mid-2014.
The aftershocks have rattled markets from Tokyo to Sao Paulo, and assets that had been top performers plunged. U.S. credit markets were hammered, with the gap between junk bond yields and Treasuries hitting their widest so far this year, while global equity markets lost $1 trillion on Thursday alone.
The brute force of the decline caught some by surprise, since Bernanke warned in late May that the Fed could slow its bond buying later this year. Even so, watching long-term interest rates rise 0.4 percentage points for the week - the biggest move in more than 10 years - after trading for months near record lows was a wake-up call.
"People live in denial all the time," said Kim Forrest, senior equity research analyst at investment management firm Fort Pitt Capital in Pittsburgh. "The thinking part of people's brains understood that rates would have to go up sometime. But they weren't ready to be told that reality starts now."
That goes for companies who now face higher funding costs and investors who had borrowed money cheaply to trade.
Investors had been funding trades in riskier markets by borrowing in the stable, low-interest-rate U.S. debt market. But the cost to borrow rises with higher rates and with increased volatility - both of which appear to be here to stay, at least for now.
Dan Fuss, vice chairman of investment management firm Loomis Sayles & Co, which manages $191 billion in funds, said: "Leverage is coming out of the market. These market moves reflect that, but when you get sharp moves like this a lot of people get nervous. That can contribute to more selling."
Bond investors hoping to play "follow the Fed" forever face an even more frightening reality. As Zane Brown, a fixed income strategist at asset manager Lord Abbett & Co noted, a return to a more normal level of interest rates would result in a zero total return over the next five years for investors benchmarked to the popular Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
Investors pulled $15.1 billion out of taxable bond funds in the first three weeks of June, according to Lipper, a Thomson Reuters service. That is the biggest three-week outflow from the funds since October 2008, at the height of the financial crisis.
"HYPER-SENSITIVE"
All of this has left traders and investors scrambling to protect themselves in anticipation of a volatile summer.
Trading in interest-rate futures contracts spiked to a record in late May when Bernanke first broached the subject of winding down stimulus. It soared again this week, when some 12.8 million contracts changed hands on Thursday, according to CME Group, well above May's daily average of 7.9 million.
Volume in S&P 500 index options rose to 2.3 million contracts on Thursday, a new one-day record, while overall options volume of 33.3 million contracts made it the busiest day since Aug. 9, 2011, four days after Standard & Poor's stripped the United States of its top credit rating.
Since Bernanke has insisted that winding down bond purchases depends on continued economic improvement, traders now have to assume nearly every economic data release will have the potential to whipsaw financial markets.
"Across the board, we have seen people paying up for insurance in the options market," said J.J. Kinahan, chief strategist at online brokerage firm TD Ameritrade. "The market is going to be hyper-sensitive to anything that the Fed says, and the three major reports on employment, retail sales and housing will continue to dominate the eyes of the market."
The CBOE Volatility Index, a gauge of anxiety on Wall Street, jumped 23 percent on Thursday to 20.49, the first time this year it has exceeded 20, an often-used dividing line between calm and stressed markets. It closed at 18.90 on Friday.
Signs of concern about high-flying assets like emerging markets can be seen in the options market, where more than 1.35 million contracts in the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets exchange-traded fund traded on Thursday - 82 percent of which were put options, generally used to protect against losses.
The Merrill Lynch MOVE Index, a measure of expected volatility in the U.S. Treasury market, rose to 103.7 on Friday; that index sat at 50 in early May, a multi-year low.
The uncertainty the Fed has sowed by telling markets they are on their own means the days of almost uninterrupted gains that have prevailed since late last year are over. And that brings problems of its own for investors and the market.
For one thing, violent price swings make investors more vulnerable to big losses, prompting them to sell assets simply to reduce their value-at-risk (VaR) levels, a statistical method for quantifying portfolio risk over a given period of time.
Rack up enough of these forced liquidations and it is not hard to see how a sell-off in one market can spread quickly to other assets and other parts of the world.
Bob Lynch, head of G10 FX strategy at HSBC, said this was a factor driving the bond and equity sell-off in late May "and could be an important input driving financial assets lower in the current environment."
"It is too early to tell if the market reaction to the Fed is just noise or the beginning of a greater sell-off in U.S. equities," said Mike Tosaw, portfolio manager at RCM Wealth Advisors, an investment advisory firm in Chicago.
"Over the course of the last month, we have been taking money off the table in the stock market and keeping the cash for the time being. Early next week, we plan to evaluate if this is a buying opportunity in stocks or if we need to run for the hills." (Additional reporting by Doris Frankel in Chicago and Gertrude Chavez-Dreyfuss, Jonathan Spicer and Herbert Lash in New York; Editing by Martin Howell and Tim Dobbyn)



vendredi 21 juin 2013

DEUTSCHE BANK: Keep The Faith; Stay Core Short EUR/USD & Add On Bounces

The markets' reaction to the latest Fed words suggest that the dollar weakness against most G10 FX seen since late May was a position unwind, rather than a harbinger of things to come, says Deutsche Bank.

"Indeed, the dollar has rallied against all G10 currencies since the FOMC meeting, and in most cases the size of the rally has been proportionate to the size of dollar weakness seen before. European currencies should therefore start to weaken against the dollar," DB adds.
Morover, DB notices another bearish factor for EUR/USD is that its Euro-area data surprises index appears to be running close to its recent years’ highs, while US data surprises are only now starting to turn  
On top of that, DB's positioning measures suggested that long euro positions ahead of FOMC reached their highest levels since 2009.
"Therefore, much of the relative good news on the euro appears priced, and so the euro should at the very least head to the low-end of this year’s range of 1.28 in the coming months," DB projects.
As such, DB advises its clients to stay core short EUR/USD as long as we hold below the recent highs, and to add to shorts on a bounce up to 1.3265/70 area. S/T, DB sees the pair targeting the 1.3070-90 area where the 55, 100 and 200 dma all lie.

Read More: http://www.efxnews.com/story/19384/keep-faith-stay-core-short-eurusd-add-bounces-deutsche-bank

jeudi 20 juin 2013

Fed Seen Tapering QE to $65 Billion at September Meeting



Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will cut the Fed’s $85 billion in monthly bond purchases by $20 billion at the Sept. 17-18 policy meeting, according to 44 percent of economists in a Bloomberg survey.
The survey of 54 economists followed Bernanke’s press conference yesterday, in which he mapped out a timetable for an end to one of the most aggressive easing strategies in Fed history. His remarks prompted economists to predict a faster reduction in purchases: in a June 4-5 survey, only 27 percent of economists forecast tapering would start in September.
Bernanke, speaking after a two-day meeting by the Federal Open Market Committee, said the Fed may begin dialing down its unprecedented bond-buying this year and end it in mid-2014 if the economy achieves the Fed’s objectives. Policy makers are forecasting growth of as much as 2.6 percent this year and 3.5 percent in 2014.
“The committee, and even Bernanke’s remarks, showed a surprising degree of confidence in the outlook,” said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist for JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York and a former Fed economist. “I’m a little more surprised that they were willing to signal they’re on the path of moving out of this set of Fed policies.”

Fed Taper

Fifteen percent of economists in the survey said the Fed will taper in October and 28 percent said policy makers will wait until December. The remaining 13 percent said the Fed won’t begin reducing its pace of purchases until at least next year.
The central bank’s forecasts for growth are more optimistic than Wall Street’s. The median estimate of private forecasters in a Bloomberg survey calls for an expansion of 1.9 percent this year and 2.7 percent next year.
The amount of initial tapering predicted by economists in the most recent survey was unchanged from the prior one. The central bank will halt bond buying entirely in June 2014, according to 44 percent of the economists in the latest survey.
If economic data are consistent with the Fed’s forecasts, “the committee currently anticipates that it would be appropriate to moderate the pace of purchases later this year,” Bernanke said at the press conference. “We will continue to reduce the pace of purchases in measured steps through the first half of next year, ending purchases around mid-year.”
Stocks and gold fell and Treasury yields rose for a second day as investors face the prospect of a wind-down in the Fed’s asset purchases. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index dropped 2.1 percent to 1,594.32 at 2:48 p.m. in New York, after falling 1.4 percent yesterday. Treasury yields rose to 2.43 percent from 2.35 percent yesterday and 2.19 percent on June 18. Gold fell below $1,300 an ounce to the lowest since September 2010.

Financial Assets

The impact of tapering is largely reflected in prices of financial assets, said Jonathan Wright, an economics professor at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore who worked at the Fed’s division of monetary affairs from 2004 until 2008.
“Saying that the Fed will taper later this year tightens financial conditions right now -- a risky strategy when the economy is only just gaining a bit of momentum.”
The U.S. central bank began its third round of large-scale asset purchases in September by buying $40 billion a month of mortgage-backed securities. The Fed added $45 billion of Treasury purchases in December. The FOMC has said since September that it will buy bonds until seeing signs of substantial labor-market improvement.

Winding Down

Reducing stimulus and winding down the balance sheet without roiling markets is one of the biggest challenges Bernanke’s successor would face, should the chairman not serve a third, four-year term. President Barack Obama said this week that Bernanke has stayed in his post “longer than he wanted,” one of his clearest signals yet the Fed chief will leave.
Fed Vice Chairman Janet Yellen is the likeliest candidate to replace Bernanke when his term ends in January of 2014, according to economists in the survey. The economists assigned Yellen a 65 percent chance of ascending to the top job at the central bank.
Former Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner was assigned a 10 percent chance of becoming the next chairman and former Obama adviser Lawrence Summers, Treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton, was given 9 percent odds.
To contact the reporters on this story: Joshua Zumbrun in Washington atjzumbrun@bloomberg.net Catarina Saraiva in Washington at asaraiva5@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Chris Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net

How The FOMC Statement Changed From Last Month?


Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in Marchy suggests that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace. Labor market conditions have shown somefurther improvement in recent months, on balance, but the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending and business fixed investment advanced, and the housing sector has strengthened further, but fiscal policy is restraining economic growth. IPartly reflecting transitory influences, inflation has been running somewhat below the Committee's longer-run objective, apart from temporary variations that largely reflect fluctuations in energy prices. L but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic growth will proceed at a moderate pace and the unemployment rate will gradually decline toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee continues to sesees the downside risks to the economic outlook outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished since the fall. The Committee also anticipates that inflation over the medium term likely will run at or below its 2 percent objective.

To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee decided to continue purchasing additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month and longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $45 billion per month. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. Taken together, these actions should maintain downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.

The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months. The Committee will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has improved substantially in a context of price stability. The Committee is prepared to increase or reduce the pace of its purchases to maintain appropriate policy accommodation as the outlook for the labor market or inflation changes. In determining the size, pace, and composition of its asset purchases, the Committee will continue to take appropriate account of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases as well as the extent of progress toward its economic objectives.

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee expects that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the Committee will also consider other information, including additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Jerome H. Powell; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Eric S. Rosengren; Jeremy C. Stein; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the action was James Bullard, who believed that the Committee should signal more strongly its willingness to defend its inflation goal in light of recent low inflation readings, and Esther L. George, who was concerned that the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances and, over time, could cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations.

mercredi 19 juin 2013

NOMURA Hits The Nail On The Head On This Week FOMC



Nomura's Bob Janjuah hits the nail on the head in my opinion:

"Here is what I think matters:

1 – There can be no doubt in my view that the global growth, earnings, incomes and fundamental story remains very subdued. But at the same time financial markets, hooked on central bank ‘heroin’, have created an enormous and – in the long run – untenable gap between themselves and the real economy’s fundamentals. This gap is getting to dangerous levels, with positioning, sentiment, speculation, margin and leverage running at levels unseen since 2006/2007.

2 – The Fed knows all this. The Fed also knows that it was held at least partially responsible for creating and blowing up the bubble that burst spectacularly upon us all in 2007/2008. But very importantly, the Fed now has explicit and pretty much full responsibility for regulation of the banking and financial sector.

3 – As such, and as discussed by Jeremy Stein in February (remember, Mr. Stein is a Member of the Board of Governors of the Fed), the Fed now de facto has a new duel mandate based on (the trade-off between) what I’d call Nominal GDP (or macro-economic stability), and Financial Sector Stability (or what I’d simply label as system-wide ‘leverage’ levels).

4 – This means first and foremost that while growth, inflation and unemployment all matter a great deal, the Fed cannot now either allow, or be perceived to allow, the creation of any kind of excessive leverage driven speculative (asset) bubbles which, if they collapse, go on to threaten the financial stability of the US. Imagine if this Fed were to allow a major asset bubble to blow up and then burst anytime soon (say within the next two or three years). This time round Congress and the people of the US would be able to place the entire blame on the Fed – probably with some justification – and, if the fallout approached anything like that seen in 2008, then it would mean, in my view, the end of the Fed as we currently know it.

5 – Turkey’s do not vote for Christmas, nor is Chairman Bernanke or any other member of the Fed willing, in my view, to take such a risk. Back in Greenspan’s day he could always blame asset bubbles on someone else – even though leverage either in and/or facilitated by the banking/finance sector is always at the heart of every asset bubble. But this get-out has now explicitly been removed from the list of options open to the Fed going forward.

6 – So for me, ‘tapering’ is going to happen. It will be gentle, it will be well telegraphed, and the key will be to avoid a major shock to the real economy. But the Fed is NOT going to taper because the economy is too strong or because we have sustained core (wage) inflation, or because we have full employment - none of these conditions will be seen for some years to come. Rather, I feel that the Fed is going to taper because it is getting very fearful that it is creating a number of significant and dangerous leverage driven speculative bubbles that could threaten the financial stability of the US. In central bank speak, the Fed has likely come to the point where it feels the costs now outweigh the benefits of more policy.

7 - As part of this, the lack of sustainable growth in the US (much above the weak trend growth of 1% to 2% pa in real GDP which has been the case for some years now) is very telling. And, while I can’t be 100% certain, at least some members of the Fed and other central bankers must be looking with concern at recent developments in Japan whereby the BoJ’s independence has, for all practical purposes, been consigned to history, and which has a two decade head start with respect to QE. At least some members of the Fed may be worrying about the future of the Fed and the US if they persist with treating emergency and highly experimental policy settings as the new normal.

8 – The Fed will hope that markets heed its message and that we gradually, through the normalization of yields (in the belly of the curve) and rates volatility (higher!), move aggressively over optimistic financial market asset valuations somewhat closer to what is justified by rational and sustainable real economic fundamental metrics. Rather than being based on some circular and self-serving ‘risk premium’ delusion, which is almost completely predicated on the bogus time-inconsistent assumption of a continuous and never to be removed Fed/central bank put on yields and rates volatility.

9 – The sad likelihood is that markets – which are suffering from an acute form of Stockholm Syndrome - will listen and react too little too late. This could give us the large 25% to 50% bear market I expect to see beginning in late 2013 or early 2014, rather than a more gradual correction. In part, this is because markets will not believe – until it is too late – that the Fed is actually taking away its goodies. Further, it’s because positioning and sentiment among investors just always seems to go to extremes, way beyond most rational expectations, before they correct in spectacular style. Think Chuck Prince and his dancing shoes.

10 - Crucially I suspect that the Fed will be so conflicted/whip-sawed by, and suitably vague in its response to data that it ends up watering down its tapering message a little too often and a little too much, thus encouraging one or two more rounds of ‘buying the dip’. This would reflect the new dual FED mandate and because we are living through an enormous and never seen before global policy ‘experiment’. Furthermore, we are probably going to see Bernanke be replaced come January 2014. I don’t actually think it matters who will replace him – anyone different is a risk and a new uncertainty for the market. In the unlikely event that Bernanke signs up for another term, I don't think that the coming shifts and changes will be reversed, but I tend to feel that the transition phase would be a little less fraught with risk and volatility, as Chairman Bernanke has credibility and the confidence of the market.

11 – So, we can certainly see a dip or two between now and the final top/the final turn. But it may take until 2014 (Q1?) before we get the true onset of a major -25% to -50% bear market in stocks. We also need to be cognizant of the Abe/BoJ developments. Along with the Fed, ‘Japan’ is one of the two major global risk reward drivers. The ECB response to (core) deflation and the German elections, and weakening Chinese & EM growth and the indebtedness of China & EM, will also matter a great deal.


As of today, my best guess is at least one major dip around Q2/Q3 (we may be in the middle of it now) as we seek more clarity around all of these drivers. My initial line in the sand for this dip is around S&P at 1530 and my major line is at S&P at 1450. A weekly close below 1450 S&P, in particular, would be extremely bearish. But I expect at least one more major buying of the dip come (late) Q3/Q4.I would not be surprised if we saw the S&P not just back up in the high 1600s, but perhaps even a 100 points higher (close to 1800!) before the next major bear market begins. It depends on who says what, and on the levels of extreme speculation and leverage. In other words, did we collectively learn our lesson from the events leading up to and including the global 07/08 crash? My 25+ years in financial markets lead me to believe, sadly, that the answer is almost certainly NO.

What I do know is that the longer we wait and the longer we put our faith in a set of time-inconsistent policies the greater the fallout will be from the forced unwind of the resulting speculative leverage extreme. This would come once the cost and availability of capital (i.e., rates volatility) ‘normalizes’. It would follow current policies that seek to force a mis-allocation of capital by mis-pricing the cost and availability of capital. I am confident that view is a correct read of the current state of affairs . And I think the Fed is telling us that they know this too. Ignoring this seemingly transparent signal from the Fed – by, for example, believing that the Fed will not have the courage to taper, or that the BoJ and/or ECB can replace or even out do the Fed over the next year or so - could prove to be extremely dangerous for investors.

We are (I think) in a new volatility paradigm now. Cash will increasingly become King over the next year, even if I do still expect another round or two of dips that get bought during this period. Not getting too sucked in and/or too long illiquidity and/or overly invested in high-beta risks should all be avoided. Nimble tactical trading of risk should be the rule. An increasing focus on de-risking core balance sheet/portfolio should, over the next 12/18 months, hopefully set one up to take advantage of what I think will be another savage bear market in global risk assets over most of 2014.

If cash is too safe, then safety should be sought in the strongest balance sheets, whether one is investing in bonds, in credit, in currencies and/or in stocks. And, as a rule of thumb, (and excluding real house prices in the US) those things that have ‘gone up the most’ over the past few years are likely to be the things that ‘go down’ the most – so as well as equities, EM investors also need to be very careful. "