Understand The Trading Arena

"It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle." Sun Tzu

Global Macro Analysis

Every markets are linked and should be analyse as a whole to understand what is really happening in the world

Forex Trading

The foreign exchange market is the market of choice for the retail prop shop to capitalize on macro themes.

Liquidity And Market Micro-Structure

Welcome market inefficiencies and learn to profit from them.

Trading Professionaly

Plan your trade and trade your plan.

lundi 30 septembre 2013

GOLDMAN SACHS - How USD longs Come Unstuck & What About EUR Longs?



The surprise decision by the FOMC not to taper asset purchases has unsettled market with many market participants who were previously proponents of the US growth story have had their confidence shaken, almost as if the FOMC knows something that we don’t.
In this regard, Goldman Sachs points to a very particular aspect to the recent Fed surprise which show large an impact there has been to FX positioning.
"Overall USD long positioning built to $21.7 bn just ahead of the surprise announcement that Larry Summers had withdrawn his name from consideration for the Chairmanship of the Fed. The first reading of the CoT report following that announcement saw overall USD longs drop to $10.7 bn, a three standard deviation decline (based on weekly moves in the CoT report since 2005). Following the FOMC “no taper” surprise, the latest CFTC report (for Sep. 24) shows a further drop in overall USD long positioning to $2.4 bn, another drop in excess of two standard deviations," GS clarifies.
"Looking under the hood, what has happened with FX positioning is even more notable. Even as USD positioning has moved back to flat, this has come because EUR longs have grown to the biggest position since May 2011. Overall, the Fed surprise has therefore caused the market to lose confidence in the bullish case for USD. Instead, the market has re-discovered EUR as its favourite, while keeping a very sizeable shorts against JPY," GS adds.
So what does this mean for the current EUR longs in the very near-term?
"The emergence of borderline stretched EUR long positions is notable not least against the backdrop of this weekend’s uncertainty over the governing coalition in Italy, not to mention the possibility of a government shutdown and the debate over the US debt ceiling, which could – in the very short term – put both positions under some unwinding risk." GS warns.

dimanche 29 septembre 2013

FX Macro And Sentiment Analysis - Week 39 - 2013

BNP Paribas: Stay Short EUR/USD Against 1.3730 & Sell Cable Against 1.6310



"The overall level of activity in the eurozone is very weak, something that ECB speakers (including board member Constancio on Thursday) have been very keen to emphasize. We continue to see risks skewed towards further policy easing from the ECB, in contrast to the exit-focused Fed, and we remain short EURUSD as a trade recommendation," BNPP outlines its current macro-bias on the pair.
Meanwhile, BNPP added a fresh short GBP/USD position to its macro trade recommendations targeting a move down to 1.5330 with a stop set at 1.6310.
"A run of strong data and firm UK front-end rates have supported the GBP this month, but our STEER™ framework suggests GBPUSD is now very rich to short-term drivers (see chart) and our BNP Paribas FX Positioning Analysis indicates long positioning in Sterling is now very stretched. We think some combination of UK data disappointment, US data improvement, and dovish BOE messaging is likely to undermine GBPUSD in the weeks ahead and that risk-reward is attractive for new shorts at current levels above 1.60 heading into important data next week," BNPP says as rationale behind this call. 
Read More: http://www.efxnews.com/story/20937/stay-short-eurusd-against-13730-sell-cable-against-16310-bnp-paribas

GOLDMAN SACHS: Betting On A Weaker Dollar


The Fed surprise last week caused growing uncertainty among FX investors and removed one potential catalyst for Dollar strength that the FX consensus had been looking for, says Goldman Sachs.
"We now expect tapering to start in December with $10bn. More importantly from an FX point of view, however, is the strengthened forward guidance. Forward 3-month rates on a 2-3 year horizon fell almost twice as much in the US as in many other major markets. The closing gap in the forward interest rate differential has been a clear negative for the Dollar," GS adds.
Moreover, GS continues to believe that front-end rates remain more important for the USD and for FX in general than swings in long-dated yields.
"The FX impact of the latter is quite ambiguous, in particular when foreigners sit on large bond portfolios and rising yields lead to losses and capital outflow, as we have seen in recent months in the US. Shorter maturities, on the other hand, mainly affect carry and hedging considerations. The larger the interest rate differential, the more expensive it becomes to hedge exposure in the higher yielding country. As the cost of hedging rises with rising interest rates, the unwinding of these hedges leads to the appreciation of the higher yielding currency," GS clarifies.
"However, none of these dynamics should apply any time soon in the US, given the Fed’s strengthened forward guidance. Of course, this assumes that inflation does not go up meaningfully and unemployment remains high -- as we and the Fed currently forecast. Even with tapering in some form, it is therefore difficult to see how the Dollar can get a boost from monetary policy currently," GS argues. 
In line with this view, GS expects the USD to trade at 1.38 vs the EUR, and 1.68 vs the GBP by year-end. 
Read More: http://www.efxnews.com/story/20933/betting-weaker-dollar-goldman-sachs

MORGAN STANLEY: Here's How Much The Economy Will Suffer Every Week Of A Government Shutdown




Morgan Stanley's Vincent Reinhart and Ellen Zentner are out with a new report on the fiscal nonsense in DC.
There are two really interesting nuggets.
Frist are the odds of a shutdown, which they put at 25%:
Our intuition is that the probability of a shutdown is relatively low but not negligible, say one-in-four. There is a powerful incentive for cooperation ahead of mid-term elections next year, as the public already holds the Congress in low repute. In addition, Speaker Boehner has the leverage that comes from the knowledge that he holds a job that no one else wants, at least for now, and that the public is likely to blame his party for failure to come to terms. As a result, he does not need all of his caucus to approve the CR as long as enough Democrats are willing to vote for it.
And here's what it would mean for the economy if there is a shutdown:
In terms of macroeconomic consequences of a short shutdown, the sudden drop and subsequent recovery in activity would be absorbed in the same quarter. There is, however, a direct arithmetic impact on GDP. Compensation of nondefense employees and civilian defense employees makes up about one-fifth of real federal spending and about 1.5% of GDP. Eliminate a third of that in a shutdown as non-exempt workers stay home, and GDP is haircut 0.5%. Annualized, this reduces quarterly GDP growth by around 0.15 percentage points per week of shutdown. Even if ex post legislation makes up the missed pay and therefore avoids a hit to personal income, the real numbers will be gone for good because the hours worked will not be made up. Note that the Federal Reserve is not part of the federal budget, so its operations will continue uninterrupted. As it is the fiscal agent of the Treasury, debt issuance and repayment will continue without a hitch.
There's one other wrinkle which matters to us (and markets) a lot: If there's a government shutdown, then no jops report on Friday.


samedi 28 septembre 2013

Stanley Druckenmiller - "The Greatest Moneymaking Machine In History"


Who is Stanley Druckenmiller?  Here is what hedge fund manager Scott Bessent says about Druckenmiller in the book “Inside the House of Money’  

Stan may be the greatest moneymaking machine in history. He has Jim Roger’s analytical ability, George Soros’s trading ability, and the stomach of a riverboat gambler when it comes to placing his bets. His lack of volatility is unbelievable. I think he’s had something like five down quarters in 25 years and never a down year. The Quantum record from 1989 to 2000 is really his. The assets grew from $1 billion to $20 billion over that time and the performance never suffered. Soros’s record was made on a smaller amount of money at a time when there were fewer hedge funds to compete against.  

Breaking the Bank of England was not a one-man job. Superlatives have gone entirely to Soros, but history has been unjust to the other genius behind the trade – Druckenmiller. Both, Soros and Druckenmiller played crucial roles and one could not have done it without the other. They were a dream-team of speculators.  

Here’s is Scott Bessent again about the infamous Pound trade:  

What is most interesting to me about the breaking of the pound was the combination of Stan Druckenmiller’s gamesmanship – Stan really understand risk and reward – and George’s ability to size trades. Make no mistake about it, shorting the pound was Stan Druckenmiller’s idea. Soros contribution was pushing him to take a gigantic position.  

When people talk about the Breaking the Bank of England story, which netted a billion pounds to Soros, few remember the mention the risk parameters of the trade. His fund was up 12% for the year, when they decided to take the trade. Their pre-defined maximum risk was the entire year-to-date profit, but not more.   It takes huge balls of steel to make such a bet.  

What is the philosophy behind Stanley Druckenmiller’s exceptional performance:  

1. Flexibility  

The Friday before the 1987 crash, Druckenmiller goes from net short to 130% long. Here is his conversation with Jack Schwager in The New Market Wizards’ book:  

- You’ve repeatedly indicated that you give a great deal of weight to technical input. With the market in a virtual free-fall at the time, didn’t the technical perspective make you apprehensive about the trade?  

- A number of technical indicators suggested that the market was oversold at that juncture. Moreover, I thought that the huge price base near the 2,200 level would provide extremely strong support— at least temporarily. I figured that even if I were dead wrong, the market would not go below the 2,200 level on Monday morning. My plan was to give the long position a half-hour on Monday morning and to get out if the market failed to bounce.  

Another important lesson to be drawn from this interview is that if you make a mistake, respond immediately! Druckenmiller made the incredible error of shifting from short to 130 percent long on the very day before the massive October 19, 1987, stock crash, yet he finished the month with a net gain. How? When he realized he was dead wrong, he liquidated his entire long position during the first hour of trading on October 19 and actually went short. Had he been less open-minded, defending his original position when confronted with contrary evidence, or had he procrastinated to see if the market would recover, he would have suffered a tremendous loss. Instead, he actually made a small profit. The ability to accept unpleasant truths (i.e., market action or events counter to one’s position) and respond decisively and without hesitation is the mark of a great trader.  

Druckenmiller flipped the portfolio from short to long, a reversal that saved Quantum in 1999, but then hurt it a few months later in 2000. Druckenmiller finished 2000 up for the year. He went from down 12% in March to up 15% for the year in his own portfolio. If you remember, the Nasdaq dumped in March 2000 but then it almost made a marginal new high in September at which point he changed his mind again, went from net long to net short, and caught the whole move down from September to December 2000.  

Stan is better at changing his mind that anybody I’ve ever seen. Maybe he stayed with it a little too long, but one of the great things about Stan is that he can and does turn on a dime. To paraphrase John Maynard Keynes, when the facts change, he changes his positions.  

2. He understands and applies perfectly the concept of risk/reward and one of his main weapons is proper timing:  One of the things that I learned from Stan Druckenmiller is how to enter a trade. The great thing about Stan is that he can be wrong, but he rarely loses money because his entry point is so good.  

3. The most important lessons from George Soros  I’ve learned many things from him, but perhaps the most significant is that it’s not whether you’re right or wrong that’s important, but how much money you make when you’re right and how much you lose when you’re wrong. The few times that Soros has ever criticized me was when I was really right on a market and didn’t maximize the opportunity  Soros has taught me that when you have tremendous conviction on a trade, you have to go for the jugular. It takes courage to be a pig. It takes courage to ride a profit with huge leverage. As far as Soros is concerned, when you’re right on something, you can’t own enough.  

It’s my philosophy, which has been reinforced by Mr. Soros, that when you earn the right to be aggressive, you should be aggressive. The years that you start off with a large gain are the times that you should go for it.  The way to build long-term returns is through preservation of capital and home runs. You can be far more aggressive when you’re making good profits. Many managers, once they’re up 30 or 40 percent, will book their year [i.e., trade very cautiously for the remainder of the year so as not to jeopardize the very good return that has already been realized]. The way to attain truly superior long-term returns is to grind it out until you’re up 30 or 40 percent, and then if you have the convictions, go for a 100 percent year. If you can put together a few near-100 percent years and avoid down years, then you can achieve really outstanding long-term returns.  

Soros is also the best loss taker I’ve ever seen. He doesn’t care whether he wins or loses on a trade. If a trade doesn’t work, he’s confident enough about his ability to win on other trades that he can easily walk away from the position. There are a lot of shoes on the shelf; wear only the ones that fit. If you’re extremely confident, taking a loss doesn’t bother you.  

4. Great defense wins championships  Druckenmiller’s entire trading style runs counter to the orthodoxy of fund management. There is no logical reason why an investor (or fund manager) should be nearly fully invested in equities at all times. If an investor’s analysis points to the probability of an impending bear market, he or she should move entirely to cash and possibly even a net short position.  

5. About valuation and timing the market  I never use valuation to time the market. 

I use liquidity considerations and technical analysis for timing. Valuation only tells me how far the market can go once a catalyst enters the picture to change the market direction.  The catalyst is liquidity, and hopefully my technical analysis will pick it up.  

6. About leverage:  You could be right on a market and still end up losing if you use excessive leverage.  One basic market truth (or, perhaps more accurately, one basic truth about human nature) is that you can’t win if you have to win. Druckenmiller’s plunge into T-bill futures in a desperate attempt to save his firm from financial ruin provides a classic example. Even though he bought T-bill futures within one week of their all-time low (you can’t pick a trade much better than that), he lost all his money. The very need to win poisoned the trade— in this instance, through grossly excessive leverage and a lack of planning. The market is a stern master that seldom tolerates the carelessness associated with trades born of desperation.     

And a more recent quote from Druckenmiller, related to Soros’s advice “don’t try to play the game better, pay attention to when the game has changed”: 

I really don’t care whether we go to $70 billion or $65 billion in September, … But if you tell me quantitative easing is going to be removed over 9 or 12 months, that is a big deal

vendredi 27 septembre 2013

The Pound Is On A Huge Tear


You have to be impressed by the British Pound.
It wasn't that long ago that everyone was making "pound getting pounded" puns, and it was universally agreed upon that the UK economy was the sickest in the developed world. And like everywhere else it is pretty mediocre.
But 2013 has been a huge turnaround year, in part due to the improving fortunes of all of Europe, and also over increased optimism with respect to monetary policy.
Today the Bank of England's Mark Carney came out and said there was no interest in more QE, and that send the pound shooting up, but actually it's been on an amazing run for months.
From FinViz:
Screen Shot 2013 09 27 at 4.16.55 AM
FinViz
Meanwhile, suddenly it's the US with seemingly inconsistent monetary policy, and a government eager to shoot itself in the foot and chip away at the dollar's dominant global status.


mardi 24 septembre 2013

Bridgewater Goes Long Treasurys


For a long time, Ray Dalio's Bridgewater, the largest hedge fund (excluding the Fed of course) was a firm believer that thanks to the "beautiful deleveraging" thesis or namely a world in which nominal GDP growth is above nominal interest rates, driven lower primarily and some would say exclusively by the backstop of Fed purchases with the result being a decline in debt relative to GDP, there could be a way out of the Keynesian liquidity trap. Alas, as a result of the recent surge higher in rates due to fears of a taper, either now, or in the near-term future, this dynamic has changed and as Bridgewater reports in its most recent big picture summary, the "beautiful deleveraging" is now far less likely.
The corollary to this rate surge is that a necessary and sufficient condition would be a pick up in the broader economy to offset the rate increase. However, at a time when the Fed is actively considering not only tapering, but also unwinding QE and money printing entirely - a reflexive condition which also will continue to drive rates higher all else equal - such a pick up would need to take place without the benefit of the Fed's active money printing.
Which, in the eyes of Bridgewater, means the only way out is for the private sector to pick up loan creation where the Fed leaves off.
This, however, would need to happen at a time when rates continue to creep higher and as a result of the increasing debt service payments to the private sector, the impact on wealth and asset pricing would be adverse. In other words, someone else would need to step in if the Fed were to step out. Can this happen? Bridgewater's assessment is that for the private sector to be able to pick up the Fed's torch to the extent necessary, is "at the upper end of the range of reasonable possibilities."
The end result: Bridgewater is now long bonds.
Whether this also means that the fund is bearish on overall growth, bullish on deflation, and very bullish that in the Taper is not only off the table but there is potential for even more easing by the Fed, is unknown.
What is known is that once the piggyback crew jumps on the Bridgewater bandwagon, which is now saying rates will drop (ostensibly leading to the end of the Great Rotation and perhaps the start of the Great Unrotation), expect to see some substantial price realignment between the two main assets classes: stocks and bonds
Read more: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-24/bridgewater-goes-long-treasurys

BofA: Here Are 5 Reasons Why You Should Be Buying Treasuries


BofA Merrill Lynch is advising clients to buy Treasury securities.
"We recommend a tactical long on the [5-year] note to position for a [10 to 15 basis point] decline in rates over the coming weeks," write BofA interest rate strategists Priya Misra and Shyam Rajan and technical strategist MacNeil Curry in a note to clients. "A combination of headline risks around the continuing resolution, dovish Fed speak, a possible Yellen nomination compounded by short positioning and technicals in the market could lead us lower in yields over the coming two weeks. Note that this is a tactical trade and we still maintain our view of rates heading higher by year end."
The strategists initiated the trade at a 1.45% yield on the 5-year Treasury note, targeting 1.3%. (Right now, the 5-year yield is at 1.42%.)
Misra, Rajan, and Curry expand on the five drivers of the trade:
  1. Fiscal headlines. "We think the chances of a brief shutdown after September 30 has increased," says the BofA team. "More importantly, the market sensitivity to fiscal headlines is likely to have increased given that the chairman explicitly mentioned the upcoming fiscal policy decisions – as a cause for concern."
  2. Possible Yellen nomination. Misra, Rajan, and Curry think the nomination of Janet Yellen to replace Ben Bernanke in the top spot at the Federal Reserve is close. "Recall that in a speech last year, Yellen prescribed keeping the Fed funds rate close to zero until late 2015 and at about 2% by the end of 2016," say the strategists. "This would be even more dovish that the SEP released this week."
  3. Dovish Fed speak. BofA points to a speech by New York Fed president and influential FOMC member Bill Dudley, who on Monday said he voted not to taper because he didn't see sustainable improvement in the labor market yet. "This continues to highlight the relatively high threshold (high when compared to what was previously thought) for the Fed to taper," say Misra, Rajan, and Curry. "Speeches by Evans and Rosengren later this week are also likely to re-emphasize this point."
  4. Short positioning. The latest survey and CFTC data showed a buildup in short positioning in Treasuries heading into last week (charts below).  "The combination of the Summers withdrawal and the dovish FOMC is likely to have helped reduced some of this short base," says BofA. "However, there may be some more short covering, as the market re-evaluates recent weak data that it has arguably ignored (as tapering for September was thought to be a done deal) in the context of a dovish Fed."
  5. Technicals. BofA asserts that there is still momentum to the post-FOMC price action in Treasuries from a technical standpoint. "Treasuries have turned near term trend from bearish to bullish with 5yr yields set to continue lower in the sessions and weeks ahead," say the strategists. "We look for a push towards the 1.273%/1.224% resistance zone, before renewed basing."
Of course, there are risks that could derail the trade, as Misra, Rajan, and Curry admit.
"Stronger than expected data and relatively benign fiscal negotiations are risks to this trade," they write. "However, the underpinning of a fragile recovery and a dovish Fed that is in no hurry to taper lead us to believe that the risks to a sharp rise in rates in the coming weeks is small."
The charts below show short positioning indicators.
UST short positioning
Stone and McCarthy Money manager survey
UST short positioning
CFTC


dimanche 22 septembre 2013

FX Macro And Sentiment Analysis - Week 38 - 2013

Forecast for US Dollar: Neutral

The US Dollar plummeted against the Euro and other major FX counterparts as the US Federal Reserve disappointed those looking for it to “Taper” its Quantitative Easing policies, but is it enough to drive the Greenback to further lows? 

Traders reacted to the “NO TAPER” headline in straightforward fashion: selling US Dollars, buying stocks, and buying bonds. All of these markets had done the exact opposite in May when Bernanke first spoke of tapering QE; in that sense, recent price action seems perfectly reasonable. But how could everyone get it so wrong, and why does the Fed’s inaction pose real risk to the US Dollar? 

The Fed made it fairly clear that it targeted specific US unemployment rates to trigger the “Taper” of QE, and it’s now obvious that we should take those targets at face value. Most traders were on the wrong side of the “Taper” trade because it was widely believed that recent improvements in labor data would be enough for the Fed to move; they clearly weren’t. The current jobless rate of 7.3 percent is above official targets of 7.0 percent, while inflation has actually fallen. 

The US Dollar and broader financial markets will now prove more sensitive to future US employment and inflation numbers than ever before. If any upcoming US Nonfarm Payrolls reports or Consumer Price Index inflation figures disappoint, expect USD weakness. 

It will be two weeks before we get our next reading of the domestic unemployment rate, and in the meantime an outright collapse in volatility prices suggests that few are betting on or hedging against big currency moves until then. Can the Greenback fall further? 

We’re watching the Dow Jones FXCM Dollar Index hold onto support at its key 200-day Simple Moving Average, which likewise coincides with key swing lows. Unless we see a substantive break lower, there’s reason to believe that markets could simply consolidate and trade in broad ranges until the Fed begins to act. Inaction would indeed favor the over-arching themes in markets. Indeed, our Senior Technical Strategist believes that this Dollar pullback may represent an attractive opportunity to get long USDJPY and USDCAD. 

But doesn’t the Fed’s inaction doom the Dollar to further losses? Not necessarily—other markets clearly reacted in dramatic fashion, but even US Treasuries and the S&P 500 are giving back some of their post-FOMC gains. 

The Fed’s decision (or lack thereof) was clearly significant, but it doesn’t need to be a game-changer. Traders are now speculating that the Fed’s taper may start in October—depending on economic data results. Given their fairly rigid definitions, we’ll know sooner or later when the FOMC will pull back monetary stimulus.


Forecast for Euro: Neutral

There is a considerable amount of event risk for the Euro – but as we have learned over the past months and years, it may not be particularly market moving. That can be both a boon and burden for EURUSD as it hovers just above 1.3500. On the positive side, the risk of a German election that forces Chancellor Merkel to have to form a grand coalition, disappointing growth updates from Eurozone PMI figures as well as other possible negative scenarios could be overlooked to the keep the euro buoyant. Alternatively, encouraging outcomes from this same round of event risk will render little – if any – support should the currency falter under a broader ‘risk aversion’ theme that would otherwise benefit counterparts like the US dollar or Japanese yen. 

For sheer headline appeal, the top event risk this week is the German Federal election. The headlines have been many and the more extreme scenarios offered up tap into foreign investors’ concerns. According to one the latest polls from Emnid, Merkel’s Christrian Democratic Union (CDU) party will win 39 percent of the vote, which with Free Democrats (FDP) 6 percent maintains the lead for the centre-right coalition. The main opposition Social Democrats (SPD) are looking at 26 percent which could be paired with the 9 percent for their Greens allies. 

Given these comfortable numbers, it looks like Merkel will serve a third term at Germany’s helm; which would reassure neighboring Eurozone members that have benefit from rescue programs as well as investors that desire a stable Union. Therisk in this event is that Merkel is forced into a ‘grand coalition’ with the SPD if enough seats are not secured in the Bundestag – a possibility if the anti-euro Alternative for Germany (AfD) party were to pull more than 5 percent of the vote and thereby earn seats that would otherwise go to the CDU. This outcome would lead to a few months of strategy wrangling and likely a cabinet shuffle that could see Finance Minister Scheauble out; but it would not likely alter Germany’s support for the EMU. 

Nevertheless, uncertainty is discouraging; so clarity on this event’s outcome will be important for the euro. This is particularly true for Eurozone members that have recently seen the need for more support or accommodation. It has been said that Greece will likely need another program next year to fill a funding gap, and Portugal was recently turned down for relaxing its deficit target. When Germany is back firing on all cylinders, these considerations can find progress. 

For the rest of the week, the euro’s docket carries notable event risk – but no single event presents an imminent threat to the region’s perceived stability. Top billing will be the September PMI data. The timely growth readings can help establish the outlook for the aggregate economy against improved growth assessments for the UK, Japan and steady reading for the US. The Eurozone Composite figure is expected to see its highest reading since June 2011 and hold above the 50.0-expansionary mark. 

Other potential volatility (versus trend) events to keep an eye on include a dense round of scheduled speeches by various ECB and political officials; the Spanish and Portugal budget reports; France’s and Spain’s 2014 budgets moving to their respective Cabinets for approval; the ECB’s report on private sector loan data for August; and a smattering of secondary indicators. 

If the euro is to generate real momentum though, it will need to do so through the likes of EURUSD and/or EURJPY. These pairs tap into something far more elemental and far more difficult for global investors to play down: risk trends. A positive run in risk appetite will find the higher returns in the periphery a draw for investor capital – especially after the breaks above 1.3500 and 133.50 (a more than three-and-a-half year high). However, should meaningful risk aversion set in – the kind that structurally lifts volatility measures and pulls down US equities – the euros papered-over problems can easily be labeled crisis sparks, sending the euro spiraling. 


Forecast for Japanese Yen: Bearish

The Japanese Yen was a bottom performer over the past week, losing ground quickly from Wednesday forward after the Federal Reserve surprised investors by keeping QE3 in place at its current $85B/month pace. Market participants were widely positioned for the Fed to taper QE3 by $5B to $15B, which we speculated could provoke a retrenchment in US yields, to the Yen’s benefit. While this proved true for the US session on Wednesday after the Fed meeting, the non-taper proved to be a major catalyst for “risky” assets. This theme should remain prime as the Japanese economic 

With the Fed maintaining QE3 at $85B/month, emerging market and commodity currencies (high yielding/high beta FX) surged between Wednesday and Thursday, to the Yen’s detriment. Perhaps for good reason, too: Japanese yields plummeted to their lowest level since early-May, transforming the Yen not as a vehicle to benefit as a safe haven but as a funding currency amid a swell in central bank-fueled exuberance. It is likely that the Yen suffers against higher yielding FX over the near-term. 

The decision to not taper QE3 in September leaves the Yen in a precarious position going forward. Foreign concerns remain hazy but look to be steadying. Geopolitically, international consensus is growing to avoid military conflict in Syria now that the Assad regime has begun cooperating with weapons regulators. In Iran, a stage for more open dialogue with the West has potentially emerged in new President Hassan Rouhani. Regardless if these talks for broader cooperation amount to anything, there’s reason to believe the “war premium” built into commodity markets (particularly oil) and the USDJPY (via Treasuries) could thaw. 

Out of the United States, two potential catalysts exist to knock the Yen around: the Fed, of course; and Congress. The Fed made it quite clear that rhetoric aside, incoming economic data would need to improve for the Fed to taper QE3. This is the same line that was towed at the June FOMC meeting which kick started the ‘Septaper’ speculation. The case for why the Fed chose not to taper was easily made with a glance towards inflation and labor data, which hadn’t shown progress since June. It also means that there is increased influence of US data on currencies and interest rates; the USDJPY in particular should show increased sensitivity to labor and inflation data. 

The US Congressional influence on the Yen should become increasingly profound over the next few weeks as it appears that another debt limit showdown is likely. As long as Congress remains a veritable drag on the US economy – Fed Chairman Bernanke aptly pointed this out on Wednesday as a reason that the Fed didn’t taper – there is scope for the Yen to at least remain buoyant against the US Dollar. The upcoming votes on the continuing resolution bills in the House and the Senate will shape the debt debate; if they don’t go smooth, greater turbulence in October is likely. In such a case, the Yen’s misfortune against higher yielding FX would quickly turn, just like in August 2011. 

At home in Japan, influences are neutral on the Yen as the economy is generally better than previously expected. The sales tax hike appears to be a go, with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe set to decide the matter on October 1, and the Bank of Japan has thus far indicated that it would be willing to extend further monetary easing to prevent a dip in economic activity (higher taxes lead to lower consumption). 

The government has pressed firms to raise wages to help offset the matter as well (which would balance out lost consumption), but so far little progress has been made on this front. Even if Japan is successful in stoking inflation, without wage growth, consumption will fall (consumers will have reduced purchasing power), and the economy will suffer once more – putting Abenomics itself at risk for total failure – and potentially ushering in greater concerns about Japan’s seemingly insurmountable debt burden. 


Forecast for the British Pound: Bullish

The British Pound extended the advance from earlier this month as the Bank of England (BoE) struck a more hawkish tone for monetary policy, but the GBPUSD may face a near-term correction in the days ahead as the pair remains overbought. 

Indeed, the BoE Minutes showed no votes to further embark on quantitative easing as the central bank anticipates a stronger recovery in U.K., and there’s growing speculation that the Monetary Policy Committee will implement its exit strategy ahead of schedule as the committee turns increasing upbeat towards the economy. 

With BoE members Ben Broadbent, David Miles, Paul Tucker, and Charles Bean scheduled to speak next week, more comments signaling an end of the easing cycle should help to prop up the British Pound, and we may see a growing number of MPC officials show a greater willingness to switch gears in 2014 as the central bank continues to operate under its inflation-targeting framework. A further look at the economic docket shows the final 2Q GDP report printing a 0.7% rise in the growth rate, but an upward revision may further the BoE’s case to move away from its easing cycle as the economy gets on a more sustainable path. 

Should the fundamental developments coming out of the U.K. continue to raise the outlook for growth and inflation, the pullback from 1.6161 may be short-lived, and the GBPUSD may ultimately carve a higher low going into the final days of September as the upward trending channel dating back to the July low (1.4812) continues to take shape. However, as the relative strength index falls back from a high of 82, a break of the bullish trend in the oscillator may foreshadow a larger pullback in the GBPUSD, and we will look for opportunities to buy dips in the British Pound amid the shift in the policy outlook.

Source: Dailyfx

CITI: How Next Week's Events/Data Will Impact FX Markets?


Next week's price action in EUR could be influenced by the outcome of the German federal elections held on September 22...As we argued in our German elections preview we expect a grand coalition to be seen as more favorable for EUR as it could imply that Germany may become more open to ideas to resolve the Eurozone debt crisis on more sustainable basis like Eurobonds. At the same time, if the incumbent coalition government of CDU/CSU and FDP remains in power, this could be seen as largely neutral to slightly negative for the single currency.  

Likely attracting the most attention will be the collection of Fed speakers across the week. Given the degree of misjudgment markets seemingly made into this week’s FOMC, investors will be looking for answers. Such hope may be disappointed however given the speakers (Dudley, Kocherlakota, Lockhart, Pianalto) have given speeches frequently over recent months and likely hit a similar message to Bernanke’s press conference. This much could keep the cyclical headwinds for the dollar in place for now but mainly against higher yielding currencies, while the USD may continue to consolidate vs. JPY.  

On the data front, markets will likely focus on the upcoming sentiment indicators out of Germany (ifo) and the Eurozone (PMIs). EUR and other European currencies remain very resilient on the back of steady stream of positive economic surprises seen over recent months. If this continues next week, we think that the single currency together with SEK and NOK could remain resilient against USD and JPY.  

Finally, investors will look to the September HSBC flash PMI for China where markets are looking for a nudge higher on the month to 50.9. Pessimism over the state of the Chinese economy has subsided more recently after the pickup in activity in the late summer. Though further improvement may support the risk complex further, we caution against indiscriminate buying. Indeed, we remain cautious on AUD and continue to favor AUDNZD downside.  

Valentin Marinov & Josh O’Byrne - Citibank  

Read more: http://www.efxnews.com/story/20825/how-next-weeks-eventsdata-will-impact-fx-markets-citi

jeudi 19 septembre 2013

DRUCKENMILLER: Fed Lost Chance For A 'Freebie' In Not Tapering



The Federal Reserve lost its chance for a "freebie" by deciding not to begin scaling back its $85-billion-a-month bond-buying program because the markets had already factored in the taper, hedge fund pro Stanley Druckenmiller told CNBC on Thursday.
"We're going into extra innings. Maybe the punch bowl was running out and just about dry and two waiters are carrying this new punch in. We're really going to party now," the founder of hedge fund Duquesne Capital, added in a "Squawk Box" interview.
The big money on Wall Street had been betting on a Fed taper, he explained, saying the Fed lost the opportunity on Wednesday to get off the "dope."
The stock market move to record highs on the Fed's inaction is great for the rich, but the wealth effect of quantitative easing bond purchases will be negative after the exit, he argued. "This is the biggest redistribution of wealth from the middle class and the poor to the rich ever. Who owns assets—the rich, the billionaires."
Druckenmiller is among those billionaires, but explained that as a citizen this concerns him. But "as a money manager and a wealthy person that deals in markets, this is great for me," he continued, "But I don't think this is great for America."
Druckenmiller argued that the Fed's lack of action will make it much harder for the next central bank chairman to start tapering.
He doesn't like the efforts of transparency in this Fed, saying that it's led to more market volatility and confusion.
The first round of quantitative easing to help boost the economy was courageous, bold, and effective, Druckenmiller continued. But he said he was not in favor of QE2.
When the QE exit actually happens, there will be unintended consequences, he said, adding that asset prices will adjust quickly.
But for now, "it's great for gold on an intermediate basis," he predicted. "And it's great for risk assets. At some point it will end, 1999-2000 ended. I don't know when this will end. I think the risk-reward is pretty good for risk assets."
In August 2010, Druckenmiller closed his Duquesne hedge fund, and now trades his own money. At that time, the fund he started in 1981 had more than $12 billion in assets. Druckenmiller made a name for himself working with billionaire investor George Soros.
Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101046576